Beyond handouts: Who really benefits from empowerment in Nigeria?
By Yinka Olaito
CITIZENS COMPASS— A growing conversation is emerging over the true impact of state government “empowerment” programmes across Nigeria, with questions being raised about whether such initiatives genuinely lift citizens out of poverty or merely recycle public funds through politically motivated schemes.
In a recent Difficult Conversation Africa Podcast interview titled “Empowerment, Exploitation or Recycled Corruption? Inside Nigeria’s State Government Projects,” which examines the design, execution and outcomes of empowerment projects implemented by several state governments, particularly those targeted at ordinary citizens -women, youths and persons with disabilities.
The video affirmed across many states, empowerment programmes are routinely unveiled with fanfare distribution of sewing machines, tricycles, grinding machines, cash grants or short-term skills training. While officials often present these initiatives as evidence of people-centred governance, the video argues that the reality on the ground tells a more complex story.
It is a known fact that experts and beneficiaries describe programmes as poorly planned, inadequately funded and rarely sustained beyond the launch ceremony. Haruna Mohammed, an investigative journalist interviewed in the podcast affirmed many recipients were given equipment without training, access to markets or follow-up support, rendering the items useless within months. A major concern that is widely raised and alleged was that beneficiary lists are frequently influenced by political patronage rather than transparent needs assessments.
The Podcast also highlights structural weaknesses in how empowerment projects are conceived. Analysts interviewed in the video note that many initiatives are not linked to broader economic or development strategies, making them incapable of delivering long-term income or job creation. “Empowerment has been reduced to handouts,” one development expert said, warning that such approaches deepen dependency rather than build resilience.
Aside from the above concerns, the issue of accountability features prominently. The podcast raises questions about how much states budget annually for empowerment programmes and how those funds are monitored. In several cases, there is little publicly available data showing the number of beneficiaries reached, the cost per beneficiary, or measurable outcomes after project completion.
Haruna Mohammed, interviewed in the video, argues that this opacity fuels corruption and weakens public trust. He calls for stronger legislative oversight, independent audits and citizen-led monitoring of empowerment schemes. Some advocates also urge states to shift focus from ad-hoc distributions to investments in education, inclusive skills development, access to finance and local value chains.
For helpless groups particularly women, youths and persons with disabilities the stakes are high. The video underscores how ineffective empowerment programmes can reinforce exclusion, especially when they fail to account for accessibility, gender dynamics and local economic realities.
As economic pressures mount and public resources remain overstretched, the Podcast concludes that Nigerians should be ready to demand evidence-based governance. The central question posed is no longer whether empowerment projects exist, but whether they genuinely empower or simply serve as another cycle of recycled corruption under a populist label.
Readers can Watch on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ro3mYILcNU



